MP SPEAKS | The questions of what party-hopping is and how to define it have, of late, been put to me over and over again by many Malaysians.

Simply put, when an elected representative moves to another party after being elected by their voters, he or she has party hopped.

In reality, however, party-hopping, or the motivation behind why an elected representative hop, is a nuanced discourse. It can occur under many circumstances, some of which the fault may be fully attributable to the elected representative, and others, which are less so.

The government of the day, upon the signing of the memorandum of understanding with Pakatan Harapan, has committed to the passing of an anti-hopping law.

The government is now in the process of engaging lawmakers from all parties, and other stakeholders, including academics, in drafting the law before the next July sitting.

Many parties across the political divide, including Umno, have expressed their commitment to the passing of an anti-hopping law.

Recall action serves as a performative guarantee

The basis of the electoral system is the constitutional right of voters. Malaysians vote to express their right to choose who they want to represent them in Parliament.

When a candidate offers himself or herself in the election, he or she is offering a package to the voter. This package consists of the candidate, the party the candidate represents, and a manifesto, promising voters what the candidate will deliver to the constituency. This is the package considered by the voter when he or she casts their vote.

My hero, former British prime minister Winston Churchill, typical of his common sense and logical way, had outlined the order of duties of an MP and this order of duties is the same for the Malaysian MPs.

READ MORE: KINIGUIDE | The anti-hopping law detour

His or her first duty is to the country. Their second duty, which is the duty of MPs to their constituents, overrides their duty to the party. In other words, all party politics and party demands come after the MP’s duty to their constituency.

An anti-hopping measure is important and relevant from a contractual aspect between the voters and candidates. When voters elect a representative, they vote based on the individual, the party, and the promises of what the candidate will deliver.

The vote is cast based on the assumption that the candidate will continue to represent the party and keep their word in delivering what they promised.

Party-hopping violates this contract, although, on the constitutional level, the law allows candidates to leave and undergo a by-election. In fact, most countries allow candidates to leave their seats and run again.

The recall action, therefore, serves as insurance to voters in making sure that they get the package they voted for, that is to say, the candidate, the party, and the promises made in the manifesto.

It also serves to minimise the impact of damage caused by party-hopping by giving voters the option of an immediate course of action when their elected representatives party-hop.

The issue of cost has been brought up where recall action is concerned. All forms of anti-hopping measures will incur some form of cost. The recall action is no exception. There will be a cost incurred for the petition. In the event the recall action progresses to a by-election, the by-election will incur costs.

The issue of cost should not be a deterrent to the recall action. The cost of not having a recall action, an immediate course of action, far outweighs the price to pay for running the petition and by-election in a recall action.

Reject political frogs for 100pct voter turnout

Every election, we see Malaysians from all walks of life and of all ages coming out to vote. They queue in the heat, they walk to voting centres if they have to, they come even if they are wheelchair-bound, and they show up even if they have to bring their children along.

They do this out of a sense of citizenship and hope for the future of the country. Elected representatives, bearing in mind that their duty to the constituents overrides their party interests, should never ever take this for granted. By voting for you, they are voting for a brighter future for Malaysia. What gives frogs the right to betray their vote?

We say we want to see 100 percent voter turnout, but how can we expect a 100 percent voter turnout when voters’ rights and voices are stamped out by politicians who feel entitled to party-hop for their self-interest?

A recall action must be put in place before the next general election to protect the vote of every Malaysian, avoid voter betrayal, and ensure constituents receive what they have been promised when they cast their vote.

MPs have a duty to their constituency and this is non-negotiable!

AZALINA OTHMAN SAID is the Pengerang MP.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.