Some DAP leaders advised Nga not to adopt the childish and immature ways of Akmal but to respond by way of facts and figures to the wild accusations of the latter.
Anyway, what facts are we talking about? I would like to know whether the DAP leaders, including Nga, could marshal facts and figures to prove the boycott against KK Mart called by Akmal hurt the economy.
If there were negative effects, Nga should present them logically and rationally. Let us not forget the axiom: facts speak for themselves.
Right now, all we know is what Nga generally and superficially commented about the boycott’s effects on the economy and employment.
He failed to present the...