Much has been written about Malaysia's stand on citizenship and how long it takes to get one finalised here. But let rethink our approach to it, besides the never-ending bashing.

Been to the United States lately? Well-known actors like Shah Rukh Khan were detained at the airport. Yusof Islam (aka Cat Stevens) was another one, stating he'd never return.

All done in the name of national sovereignty and safeguarding of their citizens’ safety and security.

Ever taken a slice of beef in your suitcase as your leftover lunch into the States? The declaration required is not funny.

Been to the UK? Seen how their immigration officers put your through a Spanish inquisition at the counter?

Back in Malaysia, the inquisition is nothing when compared to Newark Airport. We sail through. These are, mind you developed, progressive countries.

But we are talking now about a whole person, a non-citizen, being granted the right to enter into the country! If a slice of beef in your lunch needs to go through declaration, imagine a whole person!

I am a ardent supporter of globalisation and a believer protectionism kills nations. But even then, surely every country has its requirements as to what they look for in granting citizenship.

It must become a privilege to become a citizen of a country. It cannot be a handout to just anyone as the rights of the existing citizens would be compromised.

As a Malaysian, surely I cannot give my country’s citizenship to just about anyone who claims to have been married to a Malaysian.

Heard about marriages of convenience? If we have to do that then we might as well forget about any conditions. Just let all and sundry enter.

As much as we have a go at the authorities, especially the Immigration and National Registration Departments, we really need to think about whether citizenship is a privilege or a handout.